Skip to main content
Lady Macbeth as the Fourth Witch in Shakespeare’s Macbeth

Introduction
Although Shakespeare’s Macbeth
explicitly presents three witches—the Weird Sisters—the idea of a symbolic
“fourth witch” has long intrigued critics and readers. This concept does not
refer to an additional supernatural character but to a human figure who
absorbs, interprets, and operationalizes the witches’ influence. Lady Macbeth
most convincingly fulfills this role. Through her language, invocation of dark
forces, manipulation of prophecy, moral inversion, and psychological dominance,
Lady Macbeth functions as the human extension of witchcraft within the play.
She transforms supernatural suggestion into deliberate action, making her the
most effective agent of evil in Macbeth’s early acts.
1. Invocation of Spirits and
Ritualistic Language
Lady Macbeth’s first soliloquy
(Act I, Scene v) marks a decisive turning point in the play and establishes her
witch-like identity. Upon reading Macbeth’s letter, she immediately calls upon
“spirits / That tend on mortal thoughts” to strip her of feminine qualities and
fill her with cruelty. This invocation closely resembles a ritual summoning,
aligning her speech with the incantatory language of the Weird Sisters.
Her plea to be “unsexed”
places her in a liminal state, neither fully female nor male—much like the
witches, whose beards confuse gender categories. In early modern England,
witches were often depicted as transgressors of natural order, particularly
gender and maternity. Lady Macbeth’s rejection of motherhood—“take my milk for
gall”—directly echoes cultural associations between witchcraft and the
corruption of maternal nurture. This linguistic and symbolic alignment strongly
supports her identification as a fourth witch.
2. Interpreter and Executor of
Prophecy
The Weird Sisters predict
Macbeth’s rise but provide no instructions. Their power lies in suggestion, not
execution. Lady Macbeth fills this crucial gap. She becomes the interpreter of
prophecy, translating ambiguous supernatural predictions into a concrete plan
of action.
While Macbeth hesitates,
reflecting on moral, political, and spiritual consequences, Lady Macbeth
reframes murder as destiny. She insists that fate must be assisted, thereby
collapsing the distinction between prophecy and action. In doing so, she
performs the witches’ work more decisively than the witches themselves. Without
Lady Macbeth, the witches’ predictions might have remained unrealized
possibilities.
Her role here mirrors the
witches’ logic of inevitability. By persuading Macbeth that kingship is already
ordained, she absolves him—at least rhetorically—of moral responsibility. This
manipulation is a central reason she is considered the fourth witch: she
converts supernatural temptation into human crime.
3. Moral Inversion and
Witchlike Ethics
Lady Macbeth consistently
employs moral inversion, a defining feature of witchcraft in Macbeth. Like the
witches’ mantra “fair is foul, and foul is fair,” Lady Macbeth urges deception
and duplicity. She advises Macbeth to “look like the innocent flower, / But be
the serpent under’t,” promoting a worldview in which appearance and reality are
deliberately misaligned.
She regards Duncan’s virtues
not as moral safeguards but as weaknesses to be exploited. Compassion,
hospitality, and loyalty—cornerstones of social order—are dismissed as
obstacles to power. This inversion of ethical values mirrors the witches’
subversion of natural and moral law and reinforces Lady Macbeth’s symbolic
association with them.
4. Psychological Control and
Witchlike Manipulation
Another reason Lady Macbeth is
called the fourth witch is her psychological dominance over Macbeth. Rather
than using spells or potions, she employs verbal coercion, emotional
manipulation, and strategic shaming. By questioning Macbeth’s masculinity and courage,
she destabilizes his identity, pushing him toward action.
This form of manipulation
resembles witchcraft as it was culturally imagined in Shakespeare’s time—not
merely as magic, but as persuasive, corrupting influence. Lady Macbeth casts no
literal spell, yet her words exert a transformative power over Macbeth’s will,
making her influence as effective as any supernatural enchantment.
5. Contrast with the Weird
Sisters: The Limits of Human Witchcraft
Despite these parallels, Lady
Macbeth’s eventual breakdown distinguishes her from the actual witches. The
Weird Sisters remain untouched by guilt, while Lady Macbeth is consumed by it.
Her sleepwalking scene reveals the return of repressed conscience, as she
compulsively reenacts the crime she once dismissed.
This collapse highlights a
crucial thematic distinction: Lady Macbeth may act as a fourth witch, but she
remains human. Her psychological disintegration underscores Shakespeare’s
suggestion that human agents who assume supernatural authority cannot escape
moral consequence. In this sense, her tragedy reinforces the play’s ethical
framework.
6. Feminist and Cultural
Implications
From a feminist perspective,
Lady Macbeth’s association with witchcraft reflects early modern anxieties
about female agency. Women who sought power beyond domestic roles were
frequently demonized as unnatural or diabolical. Shakespeare draws on this cultural
fear while also exposing its cruelty. Lady Macbeth’s resort to witch-like power
arises from structural exclusion rather than inherent evil.
Thus, calling Lady Macbeth the
fourth witch does not merely label her as villainous; it reveals how
patriarchal society pathologizes female ambition by aligning it with the
supernatural.
Conclusion
Lady Macbeth is called the
fourth witch because she embodies, internalizes, and executes the witches’
influence within the human realm. Through ritualistic language, manipulation of
prophecy, moral inversion, and psychological domination, she becomes the
practical agent of evil that the Weird Sisters merely suggest. Yet her ultimate
collapse reveals the limits of human transgression and reasserts the moral cost
of ambition without restraint.
Shakespeare ultimately
suggests that the most dangerous witchcraft is not supernatural magic, but the
human capacity to rationalize evil and silence conscience.
Comments
Post a Comment