Skip to main content
Mary Wollstonecraft's vindication of women's rights and worn of form
Wollstonecraft
(1759-1797) authored the book in response to Edmund Burke's late 1790
publication, Reflections on the French Revolution. Burke considered the French
Revolution as an unavoidable failure because society required old structures
such as hereditary positions and property to be strengthened. Wollstonecraft's
original answer was to publish A Vindication of the Rights of Man (1790), a
rejection of Burke's argument in favor of legislative reform, and asserting
that religious and civic liberty was part of a man's birthright, with
corruption being produced mostly by ignorance. This was hardly a novel argument
for men's rights — Thomas Paine released his Rights of Man in 1791, also
fighting against Burke – but Wollstonecraft took it a step beyond and, for the
first time, a book was written arguing for women's rights to be equal to men's.
A Vindication of the
Rights of Woman was written in 1791 and published in 1792, with a second
version issued the following year. It was sold as the first book of the work,
although Wollstonecraft never wrote any more. Prior to this era, books pushed
for the reform of female education, frequently for moral grounds or to better
prepare women for their function as men's companions. Wollstonecraft, on the
other hand, condemns women's education in her introduction as follows:
I explain [these
difficulties] to a flawed educational system derived from publications produced
on the subject by men who, when considering females, She goes on to explain,
"I shall first evaluate women in the great light of human creatures, who,
like men, are here on this world to unveil their capacities....
Wollstonecraft's
arguments were sometimes decades ahead of their time. In Chapter 12 'On
National Education,' for example, she advocates for the development of a
national education system to manage mixed-gender schools. She also claims that
it is necessary.
It is essential for
women's dignity that they have the right and ability to earn their own income
and sustain themselves.
The book's chapters contain
a wide range of issues, and the numerous digressions in the text back up
William Godwin's claim that Wollstonecraft completed the book in six weeks.
Wollstonecraft's tone communicates both her sense of humor and her rage at the
weakened condition in which the
majority of women were obliged to live:
My own sex, I trust,
would forgive me if I treat them as sensible people, rather than praising their
charming charms and regarding them as if they were permanent children, unable
to stand alone.
During Wollstonecraft's
lifetime, the reaction to Vindication was good in her own liberal intellectual
dissident community, but quite hostile elsewhere. In one of his letters, Horace
Walpole referred to her as a "hyena in petticoats." Following
Wollstonecraft's death in 1798, her husband William Godwin released her
memoirs, which he had written as part of his mourning process. In them, he was
frank and honest about not just his own premarital connection with Mary, but
also her former relationship with Gilbert Imlay and the birth of their
illegitimate child, Fanny Imlay. The controversy that resulted meant that
Wollstonecraft's literary legacy was ignored, and when, many years later, Fanny
Imlay killed suicide as a consequence of an unpleasant relationship, and Mary
Godwin committed suicide as a result of an unhappy relationship. When Wollstonecraft and Mary Godwin
(Wollstonecraft's daughter with William Godwin) eloped with Percy Bysshe
Shelley, society quickly blamed Wollstonecraft's feminist beliefs.
Comments
Post a Comment